Date Log
THE QUALITY OF ONLINE TRAINING AT UNIVERSITIES IN HANOI IN THE CONTEXT OF COVID 19 - SITUATION AND SOLUTIONS
Corresponding Author(s) : Tran Hai Yen
UED Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities and Education,
Vol. 12 No. 1 (2022): UED Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities and Education
Abstract
Recently, universities in Hanoi have implemented online training to maintain training activities, especially in the context of the complicated development of the Covid pandemic. On the basis of applying qualitative and quantitative research methods, through survey results obtained from 527 students of universities in Hanoi, the research has assessed the current status of online learning quality of universities in Hanoi. The article used qualitative research methods to build a research model on factors affecting the quality of online learning of students at universities in Hanoi, from which, the article used quantitative research methods to test the reliability of the scale, exploratory factor analysis EFA, correlation analysis and linear regression model building. The results show that the factors of Orgaware and Infoware are the two criteria with the highest average score. Research results also show that all four factors of Orgaware, Infoware, Humanware and Technoware have an influence on the quality of learners' online learning. In particular, the Technoware factor has the most influence on the quality of online learning, but this is also the factor that needs to be prioritized for improvement. Based on the above research results, the authors have proposed four groups of solutions to improve the quality of online learning.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
- Alajmi, & cộng sự. (2020). Reviewing and exploring innovative ubiquitous learning tools in higher education. 32, 57-73.
- Aparicio, & cộng sự. (2016). An e-learning theoretical framework. 19 (1), 292-307.
- Bremer, C. (2012). Enhancing e-learning quality through the application of the AKUE procedure model. 28 (1), 15-26.
- Crompton, & Burke. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education, A systematic review. 123, 53-64.
- Dobre, I. (2012). An Overview of the Most Important Aspects Related to Quality Assurance in Computer Supported Collaborative E-Learning. 2 (1), 25-30.
- Entisar, & cộng sự. (2021). Factor affecting e-learning user acceptance: A case study of AULA.
- Fadi. (2016). A conceptual model of e-learning readiness: The case of the ministry of higher education and scientific research in Jordan. 2(4).
- Hạnh, N. T. H. (2021). Cụ thể hóa lý thuyết kiến tạo và sự tác động đến chất lượng học tập E-learning. 185-199.
- Mirzayi, & Sepahpanah. (2021). A study of e-learning maturity in higher agricultural education using artificial neural network. 12 (2), 117-128.
- Sim, S.-M. (2006). A simple instrument for the assessment of student performance in problem-based learning tutorials. Singapore, 35 (9), 634-641.
- Tammelin, M., Peltonen, B., Puranen, P., & Auvinen, L. (2011). Students as Doers: Examples of successful e-learning activities. 68-72.
- Thọ, V. X. (2013). Biện pháp quản lý đánh giá chất lượng học tập của học viên Trường Sĩ quan đặc công hiện nay. Luận văn Thạc sĩ Quản lý Giáo dục.
- Zemsky, R., & Massy, W. F. (2005). Thwarted Innovation What Happened to elearning and Why. A Learning Alliance Report.